Review #9233 about “Philips tat2205”
Author: Pedro
Microphone: Philips tat2205
Rating: Awful (1 out of 5)
Date:
Advantages of the microphone:
Its ands free
Disadvantages of the microphone:
The quality in a phone call and in this test its very bad, but the quality with the recorder aplication was very good. I cant understand the diference.
Its ands free
Disadvantages of the microphone:
The quality in a phone call and in this test its very bad, but the quality with the recorder aplication was very good. I cant understand the diference.
Microphone Information
| Quality Rank: | #16879 |
|---|---|
| Quality Rating: | 280 |
| Microphone Name: | Predefinição |
| Type of Microphone: | Wireless |
| Automatic Gain Control: | Supported |
| Number of Audio Channels: | 1 |
| Echo Cancellation: | Supported |
| Estimated Latency: | 0.01 |
| Noise Suppression: | Supported |
| Sample Rate: | 16000 Hz |
| Sample Size: | 16-bit |
| Volume: | — |
Device Information
| Device Name | Samsung note 9 |
|---|---|
| Device Type | Smartphone |
| Operating System | Android |
| Browser | Chrome 88.0 |
| Screen Resolution | 412×846 |
| Color Depth | 24-bit |
| Screen Orientation | portrait-primary |